Libraries – THATCamp DC 2017
http://dc2017.thatcamp.org
Making HistoryTue, 04 Apr 2017 16:57:54 +0000en-UShourly1https://wordpress.org/?v=4.9.12http://dc2017.thatcamp.org/files/2017/02/PROV_1617_2_THATCamp_Univ-calendarDrupal-Promo_220x220_v2_Option-2-150x150.jpgLibraries – THATCamp DC 2017
http://dc2017.thatcamp.org
3232Session Notes: Invisible Labor of Digital History Collaboration & I vs. We in DH
http://dc2017.thatcamp.org/2017/03/26/session-notes-invisible-labor-of-digital-history-collaboration-i-vs-we-in-dh/
Sun, 26 Mar 2017 15:42:15 +0000http://dc2017.thatcamp.org/?p=301Continue reading →]]>
“Gnomes and elves problem” – invisible labor in special collections and other fields
What is invisible labor?
Thread on Twitter a few weeks ago stating person found this hidden gem; no, a librarian found it, catalogued it, shouted it out, you didn’t discover it
Invisibility – things difficult to assess (like course surveys); direct vs. indirect measures, skills that don’t manifest until later on, hard to measure and communicate
Big issue for funding – erasure of labor has financial implications
Technology may have exasperated this issue of erasing labor
Physical card catalog bank vs. online – mass quantity better indicates labor behind it
Librarian older model seen as support for researchers, not co-researchers
DH asking for more and different support – role as librarian changing based on tasks of researchers, which plays into idea of visibility
Visibility obvious as providing a service, but less so in other ways
Be more conscious about delivering products and benefits to get away from being seen as a call center
Ex. Mukurtu Project – active collaboration with indigenous peoples; normally invisible labor but support highlighted because of direct engagement with this community
Linked the product with the process
Engage with invisible voices that want to interpret themselves
Public transcription can help as well
Ex. transcription center at Smithsonian
Use the word “product” – makes things visible, but also still invisible
Everything in libraries being “projectized”
Hard to make something like knowledge a commodity
Creating end products like transcribed Diller jokes, which is important to show what labor is doing, but then worried that we are going to be judged off of that
Turns things into assets, money-makers (look what we can do in 5 months, how much $ we can make from it)
McDonalds vs. working with a chef
Product view also erases maintenance issue
Library as servant
I’m going to go to library and librarians going to find what I want vs. librarians teaching me to find something I need
View librarians as partners
Don’t necessarily want to be more of a partner by making invisible labor visible
Show the demands, need for funding, etc.
DH is helping uncover hidden labor
Flexibility and prioritization
If we have different levels of say, describing millions of collection objects
Triage and categorize objects as demonstration of value
And different levels of support
Counter: some don’t want to value different things differently
Doesn’t mean priorities won’t change, just see immediate demand in current environment
Important to define our goals – is it # of papers scanned into internet, or more indirect measures that may take longer to manifest down the road
Quantitative AND qualitative – qualitative harder to put in grant report, for example
Subjective harder to quantify
Need a big, broad picture narrative
Librarians as experts vs. community collaboration/ownership
Use librarians as starting point to get academic project off the ground – like a guide for best practices and best tools
Write them into your budgets
MFA becoming the new MBA – we are critical
Transcribing – undergraduate students present learned how much effort it takes
Crowdfunding – often seen as solution to all labor issues (unpaid labor)
But also sense of community and getting people involved
Want to bring digital documents into physical space – show and tell model
See what digital looks like in person – seeing that would give one a different awareness