Steven Stanton – THATCamp DC 2017
http://dc2017.thatcamp.org
Making HistoryTue, 04 Apr 2017 16:57:54 +0000en-UShourly1https://wordpress.org/?v=4.9.12http://dc2017.thatcamp.org/files/2017/02/PROV_1617_2_THATCamp_Univ-calendarDrupal-Promo_220x220_v2_Option-2-150x150.jpgSteven Stanton – THATCamp DC 2017
http://dc2017.thatcamp.org
3232What’s new in institutional repositories?
http://dc2017.thatcamp.org/2017/03/27/whats-new-in-institutional-repositories/
Mon, 27 Mar 2017 16:40:56 +0000http://dc2017.thatcamp.org/?p=304Continue reading →]]>
What are people using?
ShareShelf
better for cataloging and art history
great for images
those inside the instituation can see content uploaded
ShareShelf Commons
Uploaded items can be published externally
DSpace
Updates regularly, making it difficult to customize when it comes time to upgrade to new version
Difficult with API because it keeps changing
Hydra in a Box
Fedora
Difficult with API because it keeps changing
Humanities commons is possibly a fedora database
Digital Commons
Allows publishing
Better for smaller schools
Greenstone
Islandora
Maybe moving to digital commons
DSpace and Symplectic Elements
Amanda uses at Virginia Tech
Allows professors to show what they’ve done and then it is uploaded directly into DSpace
Institutional vs. Subject Repositories
MIT has 44% of faculty publications which is a high number
Researchers are more aligned with their field than the institution they work for, so they’re more likely to use the subject repositories
Faculty is more likely to use for-profit and subject based repositories
SSRN is now for-profit
Patrick does Omeka S Beta demonstration
What’s different?
Stops people from putting htmls in description which helps with metadata
Media tab will now allow all types of media
Arbitrary html will get its own spot, which will make it easier for developers to post from across the web
Huge list of properties is cleaned up
Ability to add sites, each with their own modules and themes