Resilient Networks Projects
- How to support digital humanities projects for places that don’t have digital humanities center
- Wanted to hear everybody’s responses
- How can people start/realize digital humanities project
- A Digital Humanities Project:
- can be many things
- the kind Amanda is most familiar with is by putting humanities information online.
- making searchable databases online of historical documents/images
- WhatAmericaAte.com– created at a digital humanities center- just launched out of Matrix at Michigan State University
- they had this content, made is searchable and available
- they combined libraries, scholarship, and digital humanities center
- WhatAmericaAte.com– created at a digital humanities center- just launched out of Matrix at Michigan State University
- How can these projects last without being grant funded?
- Digital humanities center and library as the same space, doesn’t really need a center.
- Saying ejournals versus journals- they are the same thing.
- Keeping them together can help the technological people and the content people collaborate.
- Raises the Question: we don’t only do all humanities, how can we combine them and put them in the box?
- Humanities- we always need to ask for money
- Digital Humanities because a lot of humanists need help with the technology.
- Does the library support the digital humanities center or does the digital humanities center support itself?
- Specialized skills needed for humanities
- Reference librarians can guide, even if they aren’t an expert
- Digital humanities center and library as the same space, doesn’t really need a center.
- Why the humanities particularly?
- Difficulties with The idea of “the Library is the Humanities Lab” as a substitute for the scientific labs
- Engineers, sciences, etc have a lab, humanists have never worked that way
- Humanists work on their own, in the stacks
- Technological collaboration wasn’t as much a thing in the humanities in the past.
- Library is more “come to me and I can help you find something”
- Digital Humanities “we want to do this/make this/etc.”
- GMU- the center has been separate from the library and history.
- Librarians can have people come give the humanities people the workshop
- The case for digital humanities hasn’t been made yet.
- Engineers, sciences, etc have a lab, humanists have never worked that way
- Digital Humanities Center could be called Digital Scholarship Center- it isn’t just the humanities that centers support
- The Value of Digital Humanities
- Transcription is a big project in the digital humanities
- People don’t realize that search engines need text to search something
- Transcription is a big project in the digital humanities
- The Negatives of Library intrinsically connected to Digital Humanities
- Having support from the library focused on the digital humanities
- There is a lot of money, time, and people needed for DH
- Library needs be there for support to help researchers find things
- Cost
- The more information, the harder it will be to sustain
- Libraries would need to consider divide costs
- In a 40 hour work week, can put X documents online OR we can help someone do their research project.
- Trying to figure out how to make the work “good enough”
- Sustainability
- Funders are worried about funding these projects that are then done/away
- If in 5 years, no one is looking at it, you need to update it
- Labor
- Mellon foundation is using grant trying to find an alternative to digital humanities centers
- Having the people say, “we can’t give you a beautiful website, but we can get the information on there.”
- Having support from the library focused on the digital humanities
- Difficulties with The idea of “the Library is the Humanities Lab” as a substitute for the scientific labs
- What should we be doing locally and what should we be doing collectively?
- “My library has to have everything my users need” – it can’t be done
- Expertise training
- Consortial efforts to make it
- Creating a bare minimum of common knowledge
- Finding Aids and Catalogued
- Finding aids are collection guides, not item levels
- Large amount of description in the scope
- Teaching finding aids is difficult
- A lot of people can’t use the finding aids
- Finding aids are collection guides, not item levels
- Back to “What is a Digital Humanities Project”
- Once you have digitized things and put it on line, there is so much more you can do with it (mapping, text analysis, etc).
- “Digital Humanities” is a term that students don’t need to know, but the professionals do.
- Should know about digital tools, but DH is the inside talk.
- What is in scope for libraries in the DH space and what is not in scope for libraries in DH?
- In Libraries- should be making it discoverable, having collections, etc.
- The analytical side should not be in scope of library/part of library’s focus
- Similar to a writing center:
- you can reside here, but there are specific people who work within that center.
- not focus on transfer of resources into digital scholarship.
- Library- needs to limit their scope of what they can do/support
- Not everyone can do everything,
- Some libraries feel the need to save things because no one else will
- Encouraging libraries to not support things forever, but giving it a specific amount of time.
- The book- you write it and you publish it, book preservation is covered by the library, but they are used to that preservation.
- The digital project- goes out of date, the look needs to be updated, doesn’t need to be saved forever.
- “You put it online, they will come”
- A little bit of that, but it takes large amount of labor and time to get people to see it come up.
- Back to the Library’s role in analysis
- It is not in their scope to conduct analysis, but it is important for them to enable analysis.
- A commons where researchers from multiple groups can come together to learn about the basic tools.
- There is an issue of “non-consumptive research”
- Non-consumptive research- automated analysis of big data sets
- You’re not reading a million books, consuming all of the information.
- A lot of for-profit databases are selling this as a service
- Non-consumptive research- automated analysis of big data sets
- It is not in their scope to conduct analysis, but it is important for them to enable analysis.